South Korea cracks down on spread of misinformation on the internet with newly introduced legislation

South Korea, on Tuesday, began enforcing a revised law targeting false information posted online, toughening penalties for repeat offenders despite concerns over the impact on free speech.
nThe law, which requires major platforms to set up new response systems, comes as concern grows in the country over digital misinformation, including high-profile cases involving celebrities.
nBut opposition politicians, civic groups and media experts warn it could chill free speech and open the door to government-influenced censorship.
nThe Asian tech powerhouse previously relied on general defamation laws and civil damage claims to address false information — without a clear legal framework targeting so-called fake news.
nWith the revision to the Information and Communications Network Act, it joins many countries trying to tackle the flood of falsehoods online that can have serious real-life consequences.
nNow users who intentionally spread illegal false or manipulated information could be ordered to pay up to five times the actual cost of damages.
nAnd repeat offenders whose content has been ruled illegal by courts face fines of up to one billion won ($655,000).
nPlatforms including South Korea’s Naver and Kakao and US giants Google and Meta must introduce systems for users to report alleged false or manipulated information, and publish transparency reports every six months detailing complaints and actions taken.
nSouth Korea saw a surge in online misinformation following the botched 2024 martial law attempt, including unsubstantiated allegations of Chinese interference in the electoral system.
nSeparately, in a recent high-profile case, a right-wing YouTuber was indicted for using AI-generated audio to falsely claim that actor Kim Soo-hyun had dated a late actress while she was a minor.
nThe allegations snowballed into a major scandal — forcing Kim to suspend public appearances while a major project was indefinitely postponed.
nCritics of the revised law warn that the lack of a clear legal definition for false or manipulated information could create uncertainty and invite overly broad legal enforcement at first.
nThe main opposition People Power Party has repeatedly criticised the revision, arguing that platforms will censor content to avoid clashing with the government, while users will self-censor.
n“We will see a world where platform companies excessively remove information, investigative journalism is stifled, and citizens find it difficult to even speak their minds,” PPP spokesperson Cho Yong-sool said in a statement.
nThe Journalists Association of Korea also called for safeguards to ensure public-interest reporting and news-gathering are not suppressed.
nAFP
n nRelated Stories
Breaking NewsJAMB NO LONGER MANDATORY FOR ADMISSION – FG EMPOWERS INSTITUTIONS TO ADMIT STUDENTS USING SSCE RESULTS
The Federal Government, through the Ministry of Education, has announced a new policy granting Nigerian tertiary institutions greater autonomy in thei
Breaking NewsHow We Kidnapped Bayelsa Judge - Suspects
Suspects in the abduction of Justice Ebiyerin Omukoro have narrated how they committed the crime. rnrnEight of the suspects, which included six males
Breaking NewsDr. Dennis Otuaro Volunteer Media Team Berates SaharaReporters Over Unfounded Allegations Against PAP Administrator
The attention of the Dr. Dennis Otuaro Volunteer Media Team has been drawn to a recent misleading and malicious publication by SaharaReporters, accusi
