Kwankwasiyya calls for investigation into PFIPC's funding distribution

The Kwankwasiyya Movement is urging the Presidency to provide a detailed explanation regarding the controversy surrounding the alleged Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council, as the issue has evolved into a gauge of the Federal Government's commitment to transparency and accountability, affecting more than just one individual.

n

This demand was made by the movement through a statement released on Saturday by its spokesperson, Habibu Mohammed, who emphasized that the matter warrants urgent clarification, particularly in light of reports that over N1bn was allocated for the entity in the 2026 budget.

n

The movement's statement highlighted that the controversy cannot be dismissed as the alleged misconduct of a single individual, pointing out that it has become a question of public accountability, with the movement stating, "This is no longer about one man, it has become a question of public accountability."

n

The movement posed several questions, including how the council was included in the national budget if it never existed, who proposed and approved the allocation, and which government offices processed the documentation, also inquiring if any public money was released or committed.

n

Furthermore, the movement asked if official documents were allegedly forged, how they were used for such a long period without detection, describing these issues as matters of public accountability rather than partisan politics.

n

The administration of President Bola Tinubu had campaigned on promises of institutional reform, responsible governance, and Renewed Hope, and the movement asserted that these commitments should now be reflected in the government's handling of the controversy.

n

The movement noted that the Tinubu administration's promises of Renewed Hope, institutional reform, and responsible governance must now be measured against its willingness to provide full disclosure on this and other matters, warning that silence, contradictions, or attempts to shift responsibility will only deepen public distrust.

n

The controversy could also have implications for Nigeria's reputation among foreign investors, as the movement pointed out that foreign investors assess not only economic policies but also the integrity of public institutions.

n

Any uncertainty about the authenticity of government bodies or official appointments risks undermining confidence in Nigeria's governance and investment climate, according to the movement.

n

The movement called on the Presidency to publish details of the budgetary provision, including its origin, the administrative processes that led to it, and measures being taken to prevent a recurrence, also urging the National Assembly, anti-corruption agencies, and other oversight institutions to conduct an independent investigation into the matter.

n

The movement emphasized that it will continue to demand transparency, not because of politics, but because public office is a public trust, stating that every naira appropriated belongs to the Nigerian people, and every public institution must be accountable to them.

n

Ultimately, the group stressed that Nigerians deserve a full explanation of the controversy without delay, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability in the government's handling of the matter.