Former Ogun legislator explains why Jonathan can't run in 2027

Kayode Oladele, a former acting Chairman of the Federal Character Commission and constitutional lawyer, has asserted that the prospect of former President Goodluck Jonathan running in the 2027 presidential election is a matter already settled by law, and no amount of consultation can revive it.

n

Jonathan had acknowledged the appeals of youth groups in Abuja who urged him to join the 2027 presidential race, stating "I've heard you loud and clear, I will consult widely before taking any decision."

n

Oladele, a lawyer and former federal lawmaker, emphasized in a statement on Sunday that while consultation is a legitimate political exercise, constitutional qualification is a matter of law, and in Jonathan's case, the legal boundaries are already firmly established.

n

The lawyer argued that the excitement surrounding Jonathan's possible return may be emotionally appealing, but constitutional democracy cannot operate on sentiment, public pressure, or political longing, and the decisive issue is whether the Constitution permits him to contest again, to which the answer is emphatic: it does not.

n

Oladele maintained that at the level of politics, anyone can be encouraged to consult, but at the level of constitutional law, eligibility is determined strictly by the provisions of the Constitution, and those provisions are very clear, and Section 137(3) of the 1999 Constitution as amended is particularly relevant.

n

This provision states that any person who assumes the office of president to complete the tenure for which another person was elected shall not thereafter be elected to that office more than once, a deliberate constitutional safeguard designed to close a dangerous loophole in Nigeria's presidential tenure framework.

n

Before the amendment, the constitution barred any person from being elected president more than twice, but it did not address the unique circumstance of a vice president or successor inheriting office mid-term and then seeking two additional full terms, creating the possibility of an unelected successor remaining in power for close to a decade.

n

The amendment was a corrective constitutional intervention to ensure that succession by accident or constitutional necessity does not become a route to excessive incumbency, and Jonathan's rise to power in May 2010 after the death of President Umaru Yar'Adua placed him directly within the category contemplated by Section 137(3).

n

By completing Yar'Adua's unexpired tenure from 2010 to 2011 and then contesting and winning the 2011 election, Jonathan fully utilised the single additional electoral opportunity permitted to a successor president, and Oladele noted that Jonathan is not being singled out unfairly, he simply happens to be the most prominent real-world example of the constitutional scenario that the Constitutional amendment sought to regulate.

n

Oladele rejected arguments that applying the 2018 amendment to Jonathan would amount to retroactive legislation, explaining that Section 137(3) does not invalidate Jonathan's prior service or penalise him for actions lawfully taken before the amendment, but prospectively defines future eligibility criteria.

n

He argued that there is a major legal distinction between retroactively punishing past conduct and prospectively regulating qualifications for future office, and the Constitution is not punishing Jonathan for having served, it is simply saying that going forward, anyone who has completed another president's tenure and then secured one elected term has exhausted the constitutional allowance.

n

Oladele warned that any political party seeking to draft Jonathan for 2027 despite the constitutional hurdle would risk legal uncertainty, reputational damage, and possible electoral catastrophe, and such a move could trigger immediate constitutional challenges, distract from substantive campaigning, and potentially invalidate candidacy efforts before or after nomination.

n

He cautioned that political parties must distinguish between emotional mobilisation and constitutional viability, and a candidacy that begins under a cloud of constitutional disqualification is a dangerous gamble.

n

While Oladele acknowledged Jonathan's continuing stature as a respected statesman with every right to contribute to national discourse, democratic advocacy, and political consultation, he insisted that those rights do not automatically translate into eligibility for every office.

n

Oladele concluded that the recurring public conversation around Jonathan's possible return may continue as political theatre, but from a legal perspective, the issue is substantially settled, and the Constitution has already drawn the line.

n

Nigeria's democracy can only mature when constitutional boundaries are respected not only when convenient, but especially when inconvenient, Oladele stated.