Fitch flags Nigeria’s $5bn TRS over debt, liquidity risks

Fitch Ratings has warned that Nigeria’s proposed $5bn Total Return Swap (TRS) could introduce significant risks to the country’s debt management, liquidity position and future debt restructuring.
nThe warning was contained in Fitch’s latest special report, Sovereign Total Return Swaps and Repo Transactions: Q&A 2026, published on 14 September.
nThe rating agency said while TRS arrangements can give sovereigns access to alternative sources of funding and help diversify their financing base, their complexity could make it harder for investors and policymakers to determine the full extent of a government’s financial obligations.
nNigeria’s proposed transaction with First Abu Dhabi Bank involves using local-currency government bonds as collateral to obtain hard-currency liquidity.
nFitch said the arrangement appears to be driven largely by Nigeria’s desire to diversify its funding sources and manage liquidity rather than by an inability to access conventional international capital markets.
nThe agency identified transparency, liquidity management and creditor recovery as the three major risks associated with sovereign TRS transactions.
nOn transparency, Fitch said the limited disclosure of some TRS agreements could make it difficult to assess contingent liabilities and contractual obligations that may arise under stress.
nThe rating agency said provisions relating to margin calls and early termination could create additional liabilities for a sovereign at a time when its finances are already under pressure.
nThe liquidity risk is particularly significant because the collateral used in such transactions can lose value during periods of market stress, Fitch said.
nWhere governments pledge their own bonds, a decline in bond prices could trigger margin calls or force early termination of the transaction, potentially creating additional pressure on foreign exchange and liquidity when both are already constrained.
nFitch also warned that TRS arrangements could change the distribution of losses among creditors if a sovereign eventually needs to restructure its debt.
nThe agency said lenders secured by pledged collateral could potentially recover much of their exposure by liquidating the assets, leaving unsecured bondholders to absorb a greater proportion of any losses.
nDifferent treatment by Fitch, IMF
nFitch and the International Monetary Fund also take different approaches to how these transactions should be reflected in sovereign debt.
nFitch generally regards the pledged government bonds as a contingent liability and treats the financing proceeds obtained through the transaction as the principal debt obligation.
n nRelated Stories
Breaking NewsJAMB NO LONGER MANDATORY FOR ADMISSION – FG EMPOWERS INSTITUTIONS TO ADMIT STUDENTS USING SSCE RESULTS
The Federal Government, through the Ministry of Education, has announced a new policy granting Nigerian tertiary institutions greater autonomy in thei
Breaking NewsHow We Kidnapped Bayelsa Judge - Suspects
Suspects in the abduction of Justice Ebiyerin Omukoro have narrated how they committed the crime. rnrnEight of the suspects, which included six males
Breaking NewsDr. Dennis Otuaro Volunteer Media Team Berates SaharaReporters Over Unfounded Allegations Against PAP Administrator
The attention of the Dr. Dennis Otuaro Volunteer Media Team has been drawn to a recent misleading and malicious publication by SaharaReporters, accusi
