Civil society group pushes for nullification of Electoral Act provisions related to internal party conflicts

A civil society organisation, Registered Trustees of Constitutional and Democratic Justice Initiative, has instituted a suit against the National Assembly, the Independent National Electoral Commission and the Attorney General of the Federation over provisions of the Electoral Act, 2026, which it says are unconstitutional.
nThe suit, filed before the Federal High Court in Ilorin, Kwara State, seeks an order nullifying Sections 83(5) and 86(6)(b) of the Act for allegedly ousting the jurisdiction of courts in matters relating to the internal affairs of political parties.
nIt follows the enactment of the Electoral Act, 2026, by the National Assembly, which introduced fresh provisions barring courts from entertaining suits relating to the internal affairs of political parties.
nSection 83 of the Act, which also empowers INEC to monitor political parties and seek explanations over their activities, is at the centre of the legal challenge.
nThe Director of the organisation, Prof A. O. Sambo, said in a statement issued on Saturday that the National Assembly exceeded its constitutional powers by enacting the disputed provisions.
n“The National Assembly cannot legislate on what the Constitution forbids by shutting the courts out of electoral justice on matters relating to the internal affairs of political parties,” Sambo said.
nHe added, “Sections 83(5) and 86(6)(b) of the Electoral Act, 2026 violate Sections 4(8) and 6 of the Constitution by overstepping the legislative powers of the National Assembly and limiting the jurisdiction of the courts.”
nAccording to him, the claimant is asking the court to declare the provisions unconstitutional and set them aside for being inconsistent with the 1999 Constitution.
n“The provisions breach Section 4(8) of the Constitution by overreaching legislative power and Section 6 by choking off judicial oversight,” he stated.
nSambo said the organisation believes the disputed provisions, if allowed to stand, would deny aggrieved members of political parties access to justice ahead of the 2027 general elections.
n“Political party members whose legitimate ambitions have been truncated without due process should be able to ventilate their grievances in court without the jurisdiction of the courts being ousted.
n“Ouster clauses were the forte of military regimes and should not be allowed to find their way into Nigeria’s democracy,” Sambo added.
nThe case, marked FHC/IL/CS/94/26, is scheduled for hearing on July 8.
n nRelated Stories
Breaking NewsJAMB NO LONGER MANDATORY FOR ADMISSION – FG EMPOWERS INSTITUTIONS TO ADMIT STUDENTS USING SSCE RESULTS
The Federal Government, through the Ministry of Education, has announced a new policy granting Nigerian tertiary institutions greater autonomy in thei
Breaking NewsHow We Kidnapped Bayelsa Judge - Suspects
Suspects in the abduction of Justice Ebiyerin Omukoro have narrated how they committed the crime. rnrnEight of the suspects, which included six males
Breaking NewsDr. Dennis Otuaro Volunteer Media Team Berates SaharaReporters Over Unfounded Allegations Against PAP Administrator
The attention of the Dr. Dennis Otuaro Volunteer Media Team has been drawn to a recent misleading and malicious publication by SaharaReporters, accusi
