American court panel rules Facebook's parent company and video platform responsible in lawsuit over social media dependency

A California jury on Wednesday found Meta and YouTube liable for harming a young woman through the addictive design of their platforms, ordering them to pay $3 million and opening the door to potentially far larger punitive awards.
nThe verdict hands plaintiffs in more than a thousand similar pending cases significant leverage—and signals to the broader tech industry that juries are prepared to hold social media companies accountable for the mental health toll of their design choices.
nThe jury answered yes to all seven questions on verdict forms for both companies, finding that Meta—the parent company of Facebook and Instagram—and YouTube were negligent in the design and operation of their platforms and that their negligence was a substantial factor in causing harm to the plaintiff.
nThe jurors also found that both companies knew or should have known their services posed a danger to minors, that they failed to adequately warn users of that danger, and that a reasonable platform operator would have done so.
n“Accountability has arrived,” lawyers for the plaintiff said in a statement.
nA spokesman for Meta said they “respectfully disagree” with the verdict and would weigh their options.
n‘Existential threat’
nThe panel assigned Meta 70 percent of the responsibility for the plaintiff’s harm—a $2.1 million share of the compensatory award—and YouTube the remaining 30 percent, or $900,000.
nTwo further bellwether trials were expected to follow in the same Los Angeles courthouse, with their outcomes likely to determine whether social media companies fight on or move toward a broader settlement—potentially including redesigning how their platforms work.
n“$3 million is a slap on the wrist for companies like Meta and YouTube, which are two of the biggest ad sellers in the world,” said Jasmine Enberg of Scalable, who tracks the social media industry.
n“But if these companies are forced to redesign their products, that poses an existential threat to their business models.”
nJurors further found that both companies had acted with malice, oppression or fraud, a finding that set the stage for separate punitive damages, which lawyers argued in court following the verdict.
nLuis Li for YouTube apologised to the plaintiff, known in court documents by her initials K.G.M. and in court as Kaley, for the pain she suffered, but reminded jurors that punitive damages have to be inflicted in relation to the specific case and “not part of a social crusade.”
nKaley began using YouTube at six, downloading the app on her iPod Touch to watch videos about lip gloss and an online kids game. She joined Instagram at nine, getting around a block her mother had put in place to keep her off the platform.
nShe told jurors that her near-constant social media use “really affected my self-worth,” saying the apps led her to abandon hobbies, struggle to make friends and constantly measure herself against others.
nIn closing arguments, plaintiff attorney Mark Lanier cast the case as a story of corporate greed.
nHe argued that features including infinite scrolling, autoplay videos, notifications, and like counts were engineered to drive compulsive use among young people.
nMeta and YouTube had maintained throughout that Kaley’s mental health struggles had nothing to do with their platforms.
nFollows New Mexico
nMeta lawyer Paul Schmidt highlighted her turbulent relationship with her mother, playing jurors a recording that appeared to capture her mother yelling and cursing at her.
nYouTube disputed how much time Kaley actually spent on its platform, with its attorney telling the court that usage records showed she averaged little more than a minute a day on the very features her lawyers called addictive.
nThe jury rejected both defences across all seven questions on each verdict form.
nA separate New Mexico jury on Tuesday found Meta liable for endangering children by making them vulnerable to predators on its platforms and other dangers.
nThe state had sought the maximum $2.2 billion in damages, but the jury awarded a lesser amount of $375 million.
nMeta said it would appeal the verdict.
nAFP
n nRelated Stories
Breaking NewsJAMB NO LONGER MANDATORY FOR ADMISSION – FG EMPOWERS INSTITUTIONS TO ADMIT STUDENTS USING SSCE RESULTS
The Federal Government, through the Ministry of Education, has announced a new policy granting Nigerian tertiary institutions greater autonomy in thei
Breaking NewsHow We Kidnapped Bayelsa Judge - Suspects
Suspects in the abduction of Justice Ebiyerin Omukoro have narrated how they committed the crime. rnrnEight of the suspects, which included six males
Breaking NewsDr. Dennis Otuaro Volunteer Media Team Berates SaharaReporters Over Unfounded Allegations Against PAP Administrator
The attention of the Dr. Dennis Otuaro Volunteer Media Team has been drawn to a recent misleading and malicious publication by SaharaReporters, accusi
