US House set to reject bid to curb Trump’s Iran war powers

Trump
nThe US House of Representatives was expected Thursday to reject an effort to curb Donald Trump’s authority to wage war against Iran, as the president faces fierce criticism over launching the conflict without seeking approval from Congress.
nLawmakers are due to vote on a bipartisan resolution led by Republican Thomas Massie and Democrat Ro Khanna that would require Trump to obtain congressional authorization before continuing military operations against Tehran.
nBut the measure is widely expected to fail, a day after the Senate rejected a similar effort, underscoring Congress’s limited appetite — particularly among Republicans — for confronting the White House in the early days of the conflict.
nEven if it were to pass, Trump could veto it — a step that would require two-thirds majorities in both chambers to override, an almost impossible threshold in the current Congress.
nThe vote comes less than a week after the United States and Israel began a sweeping military campaign against Iran, targeting missile facilities, naval assets and other infrastructure.
nThe strikes have already killed senior Iranian leaders, including Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and triggered retaliatory attacks across the region.
nThe conflict has also claimed American lives: six US servicemembers have been killed in retaliatory strikes, including on a US base in Kuwait, intensifying pressure on lawmakers to weigh in on a war that Congress has not explicitly authorized.
nDemocrats argue the administration has offered shifting explanations for the strikes and has failed to demonstrate that Iran posed an imminent threat requiring immediate military action.
n– ‘War of choice’ –
n“Donald Trump intentionally refused to get authorization from Congress for this war of choice, a war that has now exploded to more than 10 countries across the Middle East,” House Democratic Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said.
nUnder the Constitution, only Congress has the power to declare war. The 1973 War Powers Resolution — passed after the Vietnam War — was intended to prevent presidents from committing US forces to prolonged conflicts without congressional consent.
nThe House resolution invokes that law, directing the president to withdraw US forces from “unauthorized hostilities” involving Iran unless lawmakers explicitly approve the operation.
nBut Republican leaders have rallied behind Trump, arguing that limiting his authority during an ongoing military campaign would embolden Iran and endanger US troops.
n“I think passage of a war powers resolution right now would be a terrible, dangerous idea…It would empower our enemies, House Republican Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters.
n“It would kneecap our own forces, and it would take the ability of the US military and the commander in chief away in completing this critical mission to keep everybody safe.”
nJohnson urged Republicans to oppose the House measure, arguing that the military operation had been “limited, precise and extremely lethal,” as well as a “remarkable success.”
nBut Massie, one of the few Republicans willing to break with the administration, said Congress must reassert its constitutional role.
n“Under our Constitution, the power to initiate war rests solely with Congress,” he said. “Congress owes our service members a clearly defined mission, so that when they accomplish it, they can come home.”
n nRelated Stories
General NewsCELEBRATING TWO YEARS OF TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP IN THE PRESIDENTIAL AMNESTY PROGRAMME
Tomorrow, 14TH March 2026, as we look forward to the second anniversary, we reflect on the remarkable two years since the Administrator of the Preside
General NewsPRESIDENTIAL AMNESTY PROGRAMME PHASE 3: DISREGARD PURPORTED STATEMENT ON DELAYED ITA PAYMENTS — OFFICE OF NATIONAL CHAIRMAN
The Office of the National Chairman of the Presidential Amnesty Programme Phase 3, General Elaye ThankGod Dollar Slaboh, has called on beneficiaries a
General NewsRE: CLARIFICATION ON MY PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS
PUBLIC NOTICErnrnRE: CLARIFICATION ON MY PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPSrnrnIt has become necessary to make this public clarification following the increasing
