Tariff Cut: No replacement for strong auto policy, says mobility expert

By Theodore Opara
nA mobility expert and Managing Partner at Transtech Industrial Consulting, Mr. Luqman Mamudu, has cautioned that the Federal Government’s recent reduction in vehicle import tariffs cannot replace the need for a clear and consistent automotive policy framework.
nSpeaking in an interview, Mamudu, a former acting Director General, National Automotive Design and Development Council (NADDC), warned that while tariff cuts might provide short-term relief, they risked undermining the long-term growth of local vehicle assembly if not backed by a well-structured policy direction.
nHe said, “The tariff differential being adjusted is a central pillar of the Nigeria Automotive Industry Development Plan. It was deliberately structured to give locally assembled vehicles a cost advantage over fully built imports, while government simultaneously supports the sector with financing schemes, testing infrastructure and other critical enablers.”
nLuqman added that reducing the differential, even with good intentions, must be approached cautiously, noting that many exporting countries subsidise their automotive industries.
n“In reality, lower tariffs in Nigeria can quickly tilt the market back in favour of imports—particularly when key local support programmes under the NAIDP remain only partially implemented,” he said.
nOn vehicle pricing, he clarified that tariffs are not the primary driver of high costs in the country.
n“If the objective is to reduce vehicle prices, it is important to be clear: tariffs are not the main factor. Exchange rate depreciation, foreign exchange scarcity, port and logistics charges, shipping costs, inflation and rising global vehicle prices play far more significant roles,” he said.
nHe cited recent experience to support his position, pointing out that the removal of tariff advantages for commercial vehicle assembly under the Finance Act 2020 did not result in meaningful or sustained price reductions. Instead, it led to a contraction in local assembly, with several operators reverting to full importation.
n“That outcome should serve as a guide for current policy decisions,” he said.
nLuqman acknowledged the government’s effort to balance consumer affordability with industrial growth but warned that weakening existing protective measures could reverse the modest gains recorded in the sector over the past decade.
nHe also called for stronger stakeholder engagement, urging industry bodies such as NAMA to adopt a more visible and coordinated advocacy approach to ensure that policy decisions reflect industry realities.
nDespite the concerns, he noted that the tariff adjustment alone is unlikely to deter serious investors, stressing that Nigeria’s long-term fundamentals remain strong—particularly under the African Continental Free Trade Area, which offers a vast regional market for competitive local production.
n nRelated Stories
General NewsCELEBRATING TWO YEARS OF TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP IN THE PRESIDENTIAL AMNESTY PROGRAMME
Tomorrow, 14TH March 2026, as we look forward to the second anniversary, we reflect on the remarkable two years since the Administrator of the Preside
General NewsPRESIDENTIAL AMNESTY PROGRAMME PHASE 3: DISREGARD PURPORTED STATEMENT ON DELAYED ITA PAYMENTS — OFFICE OF NATIONAL CHAIRMAN
The Office of the National Chairman of the Presidential Amnesty Programme Phase 3, General Elaye ThankGod Dollar Slaboh, has called on beneficiaries a
General NewsRE: CLARIFICATION ON MY PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS
PUBLIC NOTICErnrnRE: CLARIFICATION ON MY PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPSrnrnIt has become necessary to make this public clarification following the increasing
