PDP crisis is family affair – Appeal Court’s Justice Georgewill

By Adeola Badru
nThe Court of Appeal sitting in Ibadan has urged the warring factions of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, to resolve their differences amicably, describing the crisis as a family dispute that had “gone sour”.
nRead Also: Edo attack: Nobody has monopoly of violence – Peter Obi
nThe appellate court, presided over by Justice Biobele Georgewill, gave the advice while hearing appeals arising from conflicting judgments delivered by the Federal High Court and the Oyo State High Court in Ibadan over the party’s Ibadan convention.
nThe development came after counsel to the appellant, Mr Fredrick Ladapo, filed a Motion on Notice on March 4, 2026 seeking the withdrawal of the appeal.
nDuring the proceedings, Justice Georgewill asked counsel on both sides to clarify the applications and processes pending before the appellate court for determination.
nCommenting on the dispute, the judge said the internal crisis within the PDP was essentially a family matter that had escalated unnecessarily.
nHe noted that with the filing of the notice to withdraw the appeal, there was now an opportunity for the parties to resolve the issue out of court.
n“The dispute in the PDP as a family affair has gone sour,” Justice Georgewill said, adding that with the notice of withdrawal of the appeal, the matter “could be settled.”
nFollowing the latest development, the court directed the two factions in the party to meet with their lawyers to negotiate and agree on terms of settlement.
nJustice Georgewill explained that once the parties present the agreed terms before the court, they would be adopted as the court’s judgment.
nThe court subsequently adjourned the matter until March 11 to allow the parties to report back on the outcome of their discussions.
nThe adjournment also covers the two appeals seeking to set aside the conflicting decisions of the Federal High Court, Ibadan, and the Oyo State High Court, Ibadan, on the PDP’s Ibadan convention.
nJustice Georgewill further directed counsel representing both sides to return to court on the adjourned date to indicate whether their clients were willing to embrace settlement.
nHe added that if the parties fail to resolve the dispute amicably, the court would either proceed with hearing the appeal or transfer the case to Abuja for consolidation with other appeals relating to the dispute.
n nRelated Stories
General NewsCELEBRATING TWO YEARS OF TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP IN THE PRESIDENTIAL AMNESTY PROGRAMME
Tomorrow, 14TH March 2026, as we look forward to the second anniversary, we reflect on the remarkable two years since the Administrator of the Preside
General NewsPRESIDENTIAL AMNESTY PROGRAMME PHASE 3: DISREGARD PURPORTED STATEMENT ON DELAYED ITA PAYMENTS — OFFICE OF NATIONAL CHAIRMAN
The Office of the National Chairman of the Presidential Amnesty Programme Phase 3, General Elaye ThankGod Dollar Slaboh, has called on beneficiaries a
General NewsRE: CLARIFICATION ON MY PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS
PUBLIC NOTICErnrnRE: CLARIFICATION ON MY PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPSrnrnIt has become necessary to make this public clarification following the increasing
