Groups reject Foreign Aid Bill, urge Senate to withdraw it

Senate
nABUJA — Five human rights organisations have called on the National Assembly and the Federal Government to withdraw the Foreign Aids (Regulation, Transparency and Disclosure) Bill, 2026 (SB. 1034), warning that its provisions could restrict civic space and undermine the work of human rights defenders and civil society organisations.
nThe organisations are the Nigerian Human Rights Defenders Network (NHRDN), Partnership for Justice, Front Line Defenders (FLD), West African Human Rights Defenders Network (WAHRDN) and Protection International (PI).
nIn a joint statement issued on Wednesday, the groups said the bill, sponsored by Senator Ibrahim Hassan Dankwambo (PDP, Gombe North), had passed second reading in the Senate in July.
nThey said the proposed legislation seeks to establish a Foreign Aid Regulatory Commission (FARC) with powers to register, inspect, audit, sanction and suspend or shut down organisations receiving foreign grants, donations or technical assistance.
nAccording to the organisations, the proposed regulatory framework could affect independent civic groups, human rights defenders, legal aid providers and humanitarian organisations operating in Nigeria.
nThey argued that the bill was inconsistent with Nigeria’s commitments under the fourth cycle of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR), particularly recommendations relating to creating a safe and enabling environment for human rights defenders and civil society organisations.
nThe groups also noted that Nigeria is a candidate for election to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the 2027-2029 term, saying the country’s candidacy should be accompanied by stronger domestic protection of human rights defenders.
nThe organisations raised concerns over several provisions of the proposed legislation.
nThey said Section 6(1), which requires foreign aid to be registered within 30 days of receipt, could create difficulties for emergency funding, including legal defence, relocation assistance and support for survivors of rights violations.
nThe groups also criticised Sections 7 and 8, which provide for public disclosure of implementing partners and funded activities through a national register.
nThey argued that public disclosure of information involving human rights defenders, survivors, witnesses and individuals involved in sensitive documentation could expose them to security risks.
nThe organisations further raised concerns over Section 11, which requires foreign-funded activities to align with Nigeria’s national development plans and priorities.
nThey described the provision as broad and potentially capable of affecting organisations working on human rights, land and environmental rights, and support for vulnerable communities.
nThe groups also questioned the need for the proposed FARC, arguing that some of its functions could overlap with existing institutions, including the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC), Special Control Unit Against Money Laundering (SCUML), Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) and Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU).
nThe organisations called on the Senate, its leadership and the Federal Government to immediately withdraw the bill.
nThey also urged the authorities to ensure that any future legislation regulating civic space and foreign funding complies with the Constitution, the UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders and Nigeria’s international human rights obligations.
nThe groups called for meaningful consultation with civil society organisations and human rights defenders in developing any future regulatory framework.
nThey also demanded explicit legal protection for confidential information concerning human rights defenders, survivors, witnesses and other at-risk individuals receiving support through foreign funding.
nThe organisations further called for an expedited framework for emergency and protection-related funding, including legal, medical, psychosocial and relocation support for defenders at risk.
nThey urged the government to reaffirm constitutional guarantees on freedom of association, expression and assembly.
nWhile acknowledging the importance of transparency in the use of foreign funding, the organisations said regulatory mechanisms should not be used to restrict legitimate human rights activities.
nThey urged the National Assembly to withdraw SB. 1034 and ensure that any future regulatory framework protects the civic space and those working to defend human rights in Nigeria.
n nRelated Stories
General NewsCELEBRATING TWO YEARS OF TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP IN THE PRESIDENTIAL AMNESTY PROGRAMME
Tomorrow, 14TH March 2026, as we look forward to the second anniversary, we reflect on the remarkable two years since the Administrator of the Preside
General NewsPRESIDENTIAL AMNESTY PROGRAMME PHASE 3: DISREGARD PURPORTED STATEMENT ON DELAYED ITA PAYMENTS — OFFICE OF NATIONAL CHAIRMAN
The Office of the National Chairman of the Presidential Amnesty Programme Phase 3, General Elaye ThankGod Dollar Slaboh, has called on beneficiaries a
General NewsRE: CLARIFICATION ON MY PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS
PUBLIC NOTICErnrnRE: CLARIFICATION ON MY PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPSrnrnIt has become necessary to make this public clarification following the increasing
