Does the Country's Democratic Alarm System Remain Credible?, by Stephanie Shaakaa

In Nigeria, the question of whether the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) is truly independent has become a matter of life and death for democracy, as citizens' trust in the institution is crucial for the legitimacy of every vote, promise, and election.

n

Trust is the foundation of a functioning democracy, and without it, even the most transparent election is meaningless, as citizens will always be skeptical of the outcome.

n

The role of INEC is not just to conduct elections, but to ensure fairness and transparency, and when citizens begin to doubt the institution's independence, the entire democratic process is undermined.

n

The moment citizens suspect that INEC is not acting impartially, the game changes, and every decision, every silence, and every call is viewed with suspicion rather than principle.

n

Trust is not lost overnight, but rather it erodes decision by decision, and in Nigeria, the question of who guards the referee when the players no longer trust the game is a pressing concern.

n

The Independent National Electoral Commission is constitutionally protected, but that is not enough, as the real issue is whether citizens believe in its independence when the stakes are high.

n

On paper, INEC has a clear mandate to conduct elections, regulate parties, and safeguard the integrity of the ballot, but in reality, democracies are sustained by the trust of citizens, not just paper guarantees.

n

When citizens begin to doubt the independence of INEC, the institution's legitimacy is at risk, and this can happen not just when there is provable bias, but also when citizens cannot distinguish between constitutional independence and political convenience.

n

The law may guarantee INEC's independence, but the reality of politics is more complex, and the process of selecting leaders through presidential appointments and legislative confirmations can fuel suspicion in a polarized climate.

n

Credibility is closely tied to the transparency of leadership selection, and when citizens suspect that the referee is selective, the entire match changes, and every call becomes controversial.

n

In Nigeria, the danger is that controversial decisions that align with entrenched power, whether fair or not, can erode public confidence and create a sense of distrust.

n

The problem is no longer just about legality, but about the meaning citizens attach to each action in a system where elite capture, opposition fragmentation, and institutional distrust are prevalent.

n

In a democracy, meaning is everything, and an election is legitimized not just by the casting of votes, but by the collective belief that the umpire is impartial and belongs to the republic, not to the most powerful team.

n

Once this belief is cracked, even the cleanest electoral process can be viewed with suspicion, and in Nigeria's current political climate, this is particularly perilous.

n

Opposition parties fear that the institutional space is narrowing, while the ruling party's dominance appears to be expanding, and every procedural adjustment or delayed recognition of party factions is viewed with suspicion.

n

The solution is not to condemn INEC recklessly, but to build an electoral culture where independence is demonstrated, not just asserted, through radical transparency, consistency of action, and visible fairness.

n

Institutions become credible not by claiming it, but by demonstrating it through actions that can withstand the harshest scrutiny from winners and losers alike.

n

A republic can endure flawed politicians, but it cannot survive a distrusted referee, as once the umpire loses moral authority, every future election is tainted by suspicion.

n

The danger is not that the whistle may be blown, but that millions of citizens are beginning to wonder whether it is blown only when it suits the most powerful, and this is how democracies can suffocate without a single tank on the street.

n

Nations do not lose democracy solely when votes are stolen, but sometimes they lose it when trust in the hands counting those votes quietly dies, and a nation survives contested players more easily than it survives a contested whistle.

n

What does independence mean if the public no longer believes in it, and Nigeria must confront this question with honesty, as it is not enough for INEC to be independent in law, but it must also remain independent in the mind of the citizen.

n

Trust is the real ballot paper on which every democracy is ultimately counted, and INEC chairman Joash Amupitan must ensure that the institution remains independent not just in law, but in the eyes of the citizens.