Designated grazing areas" amount to nothing but land seizure!

The Federal Government's renewed effort to abolish open grazing and reactivate the 470 gazetted grazing reserves is a concerning revival of a policy that has previously sparked intense debate, failed to garner public trust, and proven difficult to implement.

n

This move is particularly troubling given the government's earlier promises of a new era of hope and inclusivity, now seemingly willing to resurrect a discredited scheme that could exacerbate nationwide tensions.

n

The core issue at hand is not the modernization of livestock production, which is necessary, but rather the consistent assumption that the burden of adjustment should fall on communities that did not invite or consent to it.

n

If the Federal Government is genuine about its intentions regarding the gazetted grazing reserves, it must immediately disclose their locations, ownership status, size, current use, and legal basis.

n

State governments, communities, and private landowners have the right to know if any part of their land has been set aside for this purpose and whether lawful consultation and consent were obtained prior to designation.

n

This information is crucial, as it pertains to the fundamental issues of peace, security, and property rights, and is not merely an administrative detail.

n

It is possible that some of the lands in question have already been allocated for housing, farming, schools, public infrastructure, or other development by state authorities and local owners.

n

Any attempt to reclaim such land for grazing purposes would likely lead to conflicts between landowners and pastoral interests, exacerbating the existing tensions in many parts of the country.

n

Livestock production, like any other business, must operate within the law, and those in the sector should acquire land from willing sellers or lessees and establish ranches.

n

They must also keep their animals off other people's forests, farms, and settlements, as nomadism is not a viable economic strategy in a densely populated country struggling with insecurity.

n

Furthermore, open grazing has become a cover for criminals to exploit weak enforcement and engage in illicit activities such as kidnapping and terrorizing vulnerable communities.

n

The government should abandon this idea immediately, as it is viewed by many citizens as one-sided, unfair, and dangerous.

n

Livestock farming is not an ethnic occupation, and public policy should never be designed to favor a single group at the expense of national cohesion.

n

To maintain stability, the path forward is clear: ranching by consent, lawfully acquired land, and respect for the patrimonial rights of all indigenous communities.