Court Orders Wike to Appear in Tonye Cole’s ₦40bn Defamation Suit

A High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) has ordered the Minister of the FCT, Nyesom Wike, to enter an appearance in a ₦40 billion defamation suit filed against him by businessman and former Rivers State All Progressives Congress (APC) governorship candidate, Tonye Patrick Cole.

Chief Inko Brightstar of RealNaijaGist News learnt that the lawsuit stems from statements allegedly made by Wike during a live television interview, which Cole described as false, malicious, and highly damaging to his personal, political, and business reputation. Channels Television, which aired the interview, is also listed as a co-defendant in the suit.

Justice M.A. Hassan, who is presiding over the matter, directed both defendants to enter appearance within 21 days of being served. The case has been fixed for mention on December 9, 2025.

Legal Background

Defamation cases in Nigeria fall under civil law and are intended to protect individuals from false statements that could injure their reputation. To succeed, a claimant must prove that the statement was published, false, damaging, and not protected by law as fair comment or privilege. Public figures, in particular, often face a higher burden of proof, as courts weigh public interest and freedom of expression against reputational harm.

Tonye Cole is seeking ₦40 billion in damages, alleging that the statements made by the FCT Minister were deliberately intended to tarnish his name and credibility. Legal experts note that high-profile defamation suits involving public officials and media organizations have become more frequent in recent years, raising fresh debates about press freedom, accountability, and responsible public commentary.

Public Reactions

The development has generated widespread reactions across social media and political spaces. Supporters of Tonye Cole have welcomed the court’s decision to hear the case, describing it as an opportunity for clarity and justice. Some have also argued that public office holders should be more cautious with their words, especially when speaking on national platforms.

On the other hand, supporters of Wike see the suit as politically motivated, pointing to the long-standing political rivalry between both men in Rivers State. They argue that public discourse, especially in politics, must be protected from being unduly restricted by heavy litigation.

Media analysts have also weighed in, noting that the inclusion of Channels Television in the suit could further test the boundaries of press responsibility and editorial oversight in Nigeria.

What Next?

With the court now formally seized of the matter, attention will shift to the December 9, 2025 mention date, where parties are expected to confirm their appearances and outline preliminary legal positions. The case is likely to draw significant public and media attention as proceedings unfold.