Atiku: Produce conviction evidence or… – ADC challenges APC

By Luminous Jannamike
nThe African Democratic Congress, ADC, Presidential Campaign Council has challenged the All Progressives Congress, APC, to produce any court judgment convicting former Vice President Atiku Abubakar of the allegations being levelled against him by the party, accusing its spokesman, Felix Morka, of turning allegations into verdicts.
nRead Also: 2027: You must play according to rules, Jonathan warns politicians
n nIn a statement by its Director of Strategic Communications, Phrank Shaibu, the Council said Morka could raise questions about Atiku’s record but could not present allegations as established convictions.
n“Morka has become an untutored spin doctor for a party caught in the conundrum of a sinking regime,” Shaibu said.
nHe challenged the APC spokesman to identify the court and produce the judgment if he claimed Atiku had been convicted of corruption.
n“Morka may raise each matter. He may not strip away the report’s distinctions and present the resulting fiction as a judgment against Atiku,” Shaibu said.
nThe Council then turned the APC’s attack on Atiku’s suitability to manage public funds against President Bola Tinubu, citing the United States forfeiture proceedings involving $460,000 from an account in Tinubu’s name.
nShaibu said the proceedings and associated financial records raised questions about transactions involving Tinubu and individuals named in the case.
n“A bank introduction. A transfer. A cheque. A company. Tinubu should explain those transactions and why the same names kept appearing around his finances,” he said.
nThe Council also cited the US litigation over access to FBI and other investigative records concerning Tinubu, arguing that Nigerians should be allowed to see the relevant documents, subject to lawful protections.
n“Morka’s colleagues will rush to tell Nigerians that a search result is not a conviction. Nobody has said it is,” Shaibu said.
nHe said the distinction did not erase the questions surrounding the records.
n“Yes, the case before the court concerns access to records. The records concern an investigation. Both facts can be true at once,” Shaibu said.
n nRelated Stories
General NewsCELEBRATING TWO YEARS OF TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP IN THE PRESIDENTIAL AMNESTY PROGRAMME
Tomorrow, 14TH March 2026, as we look forward to the second anniversary, we reflect on the remarkable two years since the Administrator of the Preside
General NewsPRESIDENTIAL AMNESTY PROGRAMME PHASE 3: DISREGARD PURPORTED STATEMENT ON DELAYED ITA PAYMENTS — OFFICE OF NATIONAL CHAIRMAN
The Office of the National Chairman of the Presidential Amnesty Programme Phase 3, General Elaye ThankGod Dollar Slaboh, has called on beneficiaries a
General NewsRE: CLARIFICATION ON MY PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS
PUBLIC NOTICErnrnRE: CLARIFICATION ON MY PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPSrnrnIt has become necessary to make this public clarification following the increasing
