AFCON ’25: Odegbami faults CAF verdict, backs Senegal

Odegbami
nFormer international, Segun Odegbami, has faulted the Confederation of African Football (CAF) for awarding the 2025 AFCON title to Morocco.
nOdegbami described CAF’s decision to overturn the Jan. 18 final result as “bizarre, condemnable and unjustifiable.”
nHe noted that Senegal were crowned champions and celebrated globally before the verdict was reversed on technical grounds.
n“It is unheard of in football history. You cannot take away a trophy won on the pitch two months after,” he said.
nOdegbami said the decision had sparked outrage among football fans and stakeholders worldwide.
n“This judgment has shaken CAF’s credibility. It is not surprising the world is up in arms,” he added.
nThe ex-Nigerian Football Legend questioned the motive behind the decision, describing it as risky and unpopular.
n“What could have driven such a decision that undermines the spirit of the game?” he asked.
nOdegbami said although football regulations may not cover every situation, rare cases require wisdom.
n“This AFCON case demands that rules and common sense must align,” he said.
nHe recalled that Senegal were crowned by CAF and FIFA officials before a global audience.
n“Two months later, CAF delivered what I call a ‘poisoned verdict’ through its Appeals Committee,” he said.
nOdegbami explained that Morocco’s protest, earlier dismissed, was later upheld on appeal.
n“The decision to reverse a final match result is one of the most unpopular ever,” he said.
nHe said the rules on walkouts are clear but must be applied with context.
nAccording to him, Senegal players walked off after a late penalty was awarded to Morocco, staying away for 17 minutes.
n“Ordinarily, that attracts forfeiture, but the referee allowed play to resume, which changed everything,” he said.
nOdegbami noted that petitions can alter results but argued that the AFCON final was different.
n“If this were a qualifier, nobody would question CAF’s decision. But this was the final,” he said.
nHe stressed that the trophy had been awarded and celebrations concluded before the reversal.
n“There was no room for post-match litigation in a final of this magnitude,” he said.
nOdegbami maintained that the referee’s decision to restart play nullified the forfeiture clause.
n“The match resumed, Morocco missed the penalty, Senegal scored and won fairly,” he said.
nHe insisted that CAF had no justification to overturn the result after recognising a winner.
n“Punish any infractions if necessary, but do not tamper with a concluded final,” he said.
nOdegbami urged CAF to review its regulations and restore Senegal as champions.
n“For now, CAF should retrace its steps and return the trophy to Senegal,” he advised.
n(NAN)
n nRelated Stories
General NewsCELEBRATING TWO YEARS OF TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP IN THE PRESIDENTIAL AMNESTY PROGRAMME
Tomorrow, 14TH March 2026, as we look forward to the second anniversary, we reflect on the remarkable two years since the Administrator of the Preside
General NewsPRESIDENTIAL AMNESTY PROGRAMME PHASE 3: DISREGARD PURPORTED STATEMENT ON DELAYED ITA PAYMENTS — OFFICE OF NATIONAL CHAIRMAN
The Office of the National Chairman of the Presidential Amnesty Programme Phase 3, General Elaye ThankGod Dollar Slaboh, has called on beneficiaries a
General NewsRE: CLARIFICATION ON MY PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS
PUBLIC NOTICErnrnRE: CLARIFICATION ON MY PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPSrnrnIt has become necessary to make this public clarification following the increasing
